Welcome to the fringe? Pull the other one!

Demonstration outside Underbelly

COMMENT: There’s nothing wrong with supporting Palestinian artists coming to the Edinburgh Fringe. But don’t be fooled by this talk of “free Israeli voices”.

One theme that has kept cropping up in this year’s Edinburgh Fringe is censorship. The University of Edinburgh has just held an event called “Theatre Censorship Now“, and Underbelly has programmed a series of plays Walking the Tightrope to discuss this very issue. I think we can safely assume that this is entirely in response to the protests that led to the cancellation of an Israeli play last year, because arts subsidies from the Israeli government is all sinister propaganda to make wars look good which is why all the UK artists nobly stuck by their principles and refused all money from the UK government. Possibly. I have already said what I think about the boycott, and what I think about the demonstrators demanding the boycott, and if you haven’t read those articles all you can probably guess how contemptuous my opinion is.

However, one supporter of the anti-Israel boycott I am taking seriously is playwright David Greig. When most of the supporters of this boycott were making excuses for the murderers of the Charlie Hebdo cartoonists, David Greig condemned it. When most of the demonstrators’ behaviour ranged from nastiness to borderline anti-Semitism, David Greig did at least attempt to say that wasn’t the tactics he liked to see. Now, a cynical interpretation is that David Greig is simply happy to allow other people to do the dirty work for him, but I prefer to take things in good faith where possible. So I am going to assume that David Greig’s own response to this event, his “Welcome to the Fringe” idea, is a genuine attempt to do some good and doesn’t have a hidden agenda.

Welcome to the Fringe” was a Kickstarter fund started by David Greig straight after last year’s sorry business, with the aims of allowing Paelstinian acts and “free Israeli voices” (i.e. Israeli artists who “reject state funds”) to come to the Edinburgh Fringe. This plan seems to have evolved quite as bit since its inception – it was originally floated as a week-long performance for a Palestianian group at Forest Fringe, but it has ended up as three events: a day at Forest Fringe for seven Palestinian artists (who will also get mentoring); a month-long event for Northern Stage where UK artists make a show based on the Twitter feeds of 25 writers across at Middle East; and a live screening of a play from a group in Gaza.

And I will say at this point that I have no objection to any of this. Palestinian artists – in fact Palestinians in general – get a tough time for all sorts of obvious reasons, so any help they get is quite welcome. There is the question of whether they should be associating with people who sided with some pretty nasty anti-Semites last year, but let’s face it, those Palestinian artists almost certainly have no alternative, just as other artists – Israeli and otherwise – have no alternative to state funding. It must be questioned whether Palestinian artists are unrepresented in Edinburgh when there’s a Palestinan group performing at Underbelly (quite ironic, seeing as that was the venue the pro-Palestinian crowd censored), but that’s not relevant. It’s the fringe. Anyone can perform what they like, host who they like, and fund who they like. No-one has to justify who they’re funding to anyone. So I wish all these Palestinian artists the best of luck, the same as everyone else.

But, hang on a second – this is only half of what Welcome to the Fringe was supposed to do. It was supposed to be Palestinians and free Israeli voices? What happened to the free Israeli voices bit? That has been dropped quietly with no explanation. Okay, the Northern Stage production includes Israelis amongst the Middle Eastern writers whose Twitter feeds are being used for the play, but it’s someone else’s production and someone else has editorial control over what goes into the play. And that’s not really free Israeli voices, is it? At the Edinburgh Fringe, surely a free voice means being able to come along with your own production and say what you like without any middle men deciding what audiences can and can’t hear.

Sure, there were some caveats in the original Kickstarter about why funds won’t necessarily be distributed 50:50, and yes, I agree that the average Israeli artist has better opportunities than the average Palestinian artist, but when you set up the fund in the immediate aftermath of the censored Israeli group being blamed for taking funds from their government, you have some explaining to do. Honor Bayes of the stage was quite happy to say it was Incubator Theatre’s fault for not seeking alternative sources of funding such as Welcome to the Fringe (which didn’t even exist that year). To be fair, she has since backtracked a little and accepted that driving them out with a baying mob was not an acceptable response, but you can bet there are a lot of other people don’t have such reservations. Bottom line is that Welcome to the Fringe is not a viable source of funding to take an Israeli show to Edinburgh.

The only consolation is that had a fund for “free Israeli voices” actually gone ahead, that would probably have made things even worse. David Greig might be interested in supporting Israelis who don’t want to take government funding, but the vast majority of his supporters blatantly don’t. Remember, the people who hounded out Incubator were not protesting against Israeli artists expressing voices in favour of the war – they were protesting against Israelis having any kind of voice at all. They objected to “normalising” Israel – in other words, the thought that British people might see some Israelis on stage and discover they are ordinary people like the rest of us is so unacceptable that it must be stopped, by any means necessary.

And given how much they hate Isrealis being seen as “normal”, would they have stopped protesting against The City if a rich donor offered to replace the funding from the Israeli Ministry of Culture? I think not. So if they won’t accept Israeli theatre that doesn’t mention the war, that leaves Israeli theatre that does mention the war. And I think we can also safely rule out any play that supports the IDF, so what’s left from Israel that’s acceptable to the BDS crowd? Yes, by elimination, it’s likely to be only plays from Israelis that make Israel look bad. And if this all sound paranoid, remember that the most famous Isreali artists that the pro-Palestinian campaign back was Gilad Atzmon, a jazz musician who spent lots of his time peddling the nastiest anti-Semitic conspiriacy claims. (The pro-Palestinian side eventually ditched him, but very late in the day.) That, I’m afraid, is what so-called free Israeli voices is likely to mean.

But we’re not doing this. So, David Greig, if you want to quietly drop the free Israeli voices from your project, be my guest. No-one will mind. One side doesn’t believe in supporting free Israeli voices, and the other side doesn’t believe those Israeli voices are really free. Go ahead and support Palestinian artists anyway you like. Feel good about yourself. You never know, if you behave yourself I might come and see it one day.

But the fact remains that you had the chance to show there’s an alternative to Israeli state funding, and you didn’t. Israeli artists are in the same position as the vast majority of UK artists – take state funding or don’t be an artist. David Greig, Forest Fringe and Northern Stage: the next time any of you berate an Israeli artist for taking state funds, I will expose that for the sanctimonious hypocrisy it is. Consider this your only warning.

Advertisements

2 Comments

Filed under Comment

2 responses to “Welcome to the fringe? Pull the other one!

  1. David Greig

    Hello,

    Ayman Nahas, the comedian who is part of the Welcome to the Fringe day is from Haifa. There are Israeli voices as part of the Here Is The News play.

    I would have liked to have supported more non-government funded Israeli work but I found it very hard to make the contacts that would have enabled that to happen. I was also happy to prioritise palestinian work from the West Bank and Gaza on the basis that the obstacles to their presence in Edinburgh are more than simply financial and the support we offer includes professional development which is less available to artists from those places than it is to comedians and theatre companies in Israel itself.

    There is an Israeli theatre company at Summerhall this year which has not taken government funds and there is no protest.

    Most shows that come to Edinburgh, from whichever country, don’t have government support and so asking Israeli companies to reject ‘brand Israel’ ought not to be a fatal blow to their coming. If, as you describe, a rich donor had funded ‘The City’, there would have been no letter of protest from me.

    The boycott, which I support, is not ethical consumerism. It is a specific response to a request from Palestinian artists to show solidarity with their plight under occupation. If and when any other oppressed artists from any other countries ask UK artists to participate in a boycott I would consider that. For example, if the representative groups of gay Russian artists suggested there should be a boycott of Russian government promoted art to draw attention to their situation I would consider supporting that too.

    No artists elsewhere in the world, as far as I know, have called for a boycott of UK Government funded art to protest about Iraq or Nuclear weapons or other issues. Nor have any UK artists asked that there be such a boycott. I can’t therefore observe or not observe it. As I say, the boycott is not ethical consumerism and it’s point is not to make me ‘feel good’. It is, like a strike, a direct, practical, organised political response to given circumstances. When strikes are called, it is not uncommon for other workers to show solidarity and support.

    I personally do not support picketing as a tactic to promote the boycott. i think it is counter productive. I would rather persuade people with information and leafleting. I would discourage anyone from noisy or disruptive picketing.

    Welcome To The Fringe is not as good as it should be. It’s a haphazard response which was borne in a moment of felt urgency. It’s been organised by me with a few colleagues and we are not expert at arts festival organising. I wish I had been able to do it better.

    However we have brought over Palestinian voices who would otherwise be unheard in Edinburgh. They will be able to see a lot of shows that they would otherwise be unable to see. Their own shows are good and they will be able to meet an audience here. The work is not propaganda. The various artists are able to speak for themselves. If you want to come and discuss the boycott with them, or their art, or indeed any other issues pertaining to Palestine you would be very welcome at Forest Fringe on 23rd.

    I respect that you don’t support the boycott. Many supporters of Welcome to the Fringe don’t.

    If you do come down, please feel free to find me and we can discuss the issues further.

    Best

    David Greig

    • Thanks for the reply. There are a number of things I would respond to in detail elsewhere, but I have a rule on this blog that when I’m critical of another artist, I allow that artist to have the last word. I am glad, however, that you oppose the means used to stop The City performing. I strongly support the right of anybody to perform what they like and say what they like at the Fringe, but that must extend to protest against what you like, just so long as you don’t use to to silence other voices. It’s a pity that your civilised approach doesn’t apply to more people.

      What I will say is that the main problem I have with people who call themselves “pro-Palestinian” is that the loudest voices in the movement also tend to be the nastiest. I’m sure there are many people who are horrified that the anti-Israel protests in Paris ended up with Jewish shop windows to be smashed. They need to reclaim the pro-Palestinian movement from the extremists. You’d be well placed to do that, because people would probably listen to you.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s